Last week I spoke
with Reuters reporter Nichola Groom about her recent article on the carbon
tracking market and
how, as her article states, "more than 50 companies offer software products that measure
carbon footprints. I then remembered a similar article from
earlier this summer by Lindsay Riddell of the San Francisco Business Times.
Lindsay's conclusion: "Competition is heating up in the carbon accounting
software market...and companies across the globe clamor for a piece of the
carbon accounting action." I am reminded daily of this intense greentech
competition, and it's not exclusive to the carbon accounting market. Solar
companies race to see who can reach grid parity the fastest, car makers scramble to create
the most fuel-efficient vehicles on the market, and start-ups across
industries compete for funding.
So I'm left asking myself this question: amidst all of this competition, where
is the collaboration?
With this question
in mind, I welcomed Carolyn Heinze's recent article for EnergyBiz Insider. Carolyn writes: "If a smarter grid
is to work, then utilities must be open to working more closely with one
another." Carolyn talks about workshops designed to help both utilities and
vendors explore potential working relationships. Carolyn's article is a breath
of fresh air. It's a reminder that, while competition makes innovation more
exciting, we need to find a balance between the competitive and the
collaborative.
What do you think?
Will greater emphasis on collaboration stifle the entrepreneurial spirit
that brings new technologies to life (for example, would Apple have grown at the
same rate if it didn't have to battle Microsoft for market share)? How do we
find the right balance so we don't lose sight of our broader goals, which in the
case of greentech involve a cleaner, healthier planet?
Contributed by
Susan Wise. Follow her @swise
You bring up an interesting question, Susan. I think collaboration and competition aren't mutually exclusive. Take Silicon Valley and the birth of the technology revolution as an example. Collaboration - both informally and a through institutions like Stanford Industrial Park and Xerox PARC - helped spur innovation. At the same time, competition - for venture funding, resources, and customers - helped make innovation a do-or-die mandate, which accelerated the rate of new developments.
Collaboration and competition both happen naturally, but perhaps we can do more to encourage both.
Posted by: Catharine Morgan | August 25, 2009 at 10:12 PM